Kan Alsoknownas Kn Threads Say More An account (did:plc:5jlntafiuvnkgo2qlco46mmy) was able to register the alsoknownas: at: p.f. this is coming from the stems.social instance. i feel like this is a not valid hostname (in addition to being a non existent tld). probably not. Instead of checking the first element of the "alsoknownas" value to compare against a hostname, you should check if the list contains the hostname. the did plc spec has room for backwards compatible improvement to support multiple identity associations.

Consider Validating Alsoknownas Hostnames More Issue 16 Did Method It is best practice *not* to > consider them equivalent in the absence of this inverse relationship. in > other words, the presence of an alsoknownas > < w3.org tr did core #dfn alsoknownas > assertion does not > prove that this assertion is true. Alsoknownas: should include an at: uri indicating a handle (hostname) for the account. note that the handle did mapping needs to be validated bi directionally (via handle resolution), and needs to be re verified periodically. The alsoknownas property has been added to the did spec recently. it’s basically a string array of some identifiers (uris) by which the did subject can also be identified. (see the corresponding section in w3c did core). Specify intended plc host, in did document? protip! type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.

Specify Intended Plc Host In Did Document Issue 33 Did Method The alsoknownas property has been added to the did spec recently. it’s basically a string array of some identifiers (uris) by which the did subject can also be identified. (see the corresponding section in w3c did core). Specify intended plc host, in did document? protip! type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page. The (tbh, non normative) activitystreams ontology refers to did core, so i read this as the predicate being imported from there. however, looking at the did ontology, it states that the alsoknownas predicate is in the activitystreams namespace. how do i read this?. Currently, atproto supports two did methods: did:web, which is a w3c standard based on https (and dns). the identifier section is a hostname. this method is supported in atproto to provide an independent alternative to did:plc. We may also want to mention the equivalentid metadata property, which has stronger semantics than alsoknownas. equivalentid is specifically meant to be used for same identifiers within a single did method, i.e. did:webs in this case. For pds service urls (http s), we can probably use a standard library built in normalization method. we should probably also check:.

Sj Alsoknownas Juju S Videos With Tiktok The (tbh, non normative) activitystreams ontology refers to did core, so i read this as the predicate being imported from there. however, looking at the did ontology, it states that the alsoknownas predicate is in the activitystreams namespace. how do i read this?. Currently, atproto supports two did methods: did:web, which is a w3c standard based on https (and dns). the identifier section is a hostname. this method is supported in atproto to provide an independent alternative to did:plc. We may also want to mention the equivalentid metadata property, which has stronger semantics than alsoknownas. equivalentid is specifically meant to be used for same identifiers within a single did method, i.e. did:webs in this case. For pds service urls (http s), we can probably use a standard library built in normalization method. we should probably also check:.

Local Installation Issue Customization Is Not Validating Community We may also want to mention the equivalentid metadata property, which has stronger semantics than alsoknownas. equivalentid is specifically meant to be used for same identifiers within a single did method, i.e. did:webs in this case. For pds service urls (http s), we can probably use a standard library built in normalization method. we should probably also check:.